KUALA LUMPUR: The Housing Controller has no power to grant an extension of time to developers who delay the completion of housing projects, the High Court has ruled in a landmark judgment.
This means a housing developer has to pay compensation to the affected buyers for delays in the delivery of vacant possession.
High Court (Appellate and Special Powers) judge Justice Hanipah Farikullah also held that the regulation which empowers the Controller to modify terms of the contract of sale was ultra vires the Housing Development, Control and Licensing Act.
The judge said this in allowing an application for judicial review by 71 buyers of the Sri Istana condominiums in Old Klang Road against the Housing Controller and Urban Well-being, Housing and Local Government Minister.
Their lead counsel Datuk Wong Kok Leong told The Star the judge held that the minister’s decision to grant the developer an extension of time to complete the project via a letter dated Nov 17, 2015 was invalid.
In the letter, the minister had granted the developer a 12-month extension to complete the project.
“This means that the Housing Controller has no power to grant an extension of time to housing developers for any delay in completing their projects,” Wong said.
“Now, the developer has to pay the liquidated damages (a pre-determined sum) for late delivery of vacant possession of those condominium units.”
Wong called the decision a landmark judgment as many project developers seek extensions to complete their projects in Malaysia.
“This is a victory for all house buyers. With this ruling, the housing developer can’t just go to the Housing Controller for an extension of time to complete the project in order to avoid paying the liquidated damages to house buyers.
“This is because if an extension of time is allowed, house buyers lose their rights to claim damages for late delivery of vacant possession,” he added.
Wong explained that according to the liquidated damages clause, the condo buyers can claim 10% per annum of the purchase price for the delay.
In their application for judicial review, the condo buyers stated that they wanted to quash the decision allowing BHL Construction Sdn Bhd an extension of time for the delivery of vacant possession from 36 months to 48 months.
They also asked the court for a declaration that Regulation 11(3) was ultra vires of the Housing Development Act (Control and Licensing) Act.
Wong said the judge has ordered the parties to address the issue of costs on the next date for case management.
When contacted, SFC Mohamad Rizal said the judge also allowed a similar application involving another group of condominium buyers involving the same developer and project.
Source: By m. mageswari, royce tan, thean lee cheng,eugene mahalingam, The Star